[Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
Mike Miller
python-dev at mgmiller.net
Fri Dec 22 16:02:38 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Dec 22 16:02:38 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2017-12-22 12:15, Chris Barker wrote: > Would it be crazy to bring typing.Any into the builtin namespace? > > @dataclass: > a: Any > b: Any = 34 > c: int = 0 > > That reads pretty well to me.... > And having Any available in the built in namespace may help in other cases where There is already an "any" function in the builtins. It looks fine but not sure how it will interact with type checkers. The "dataclass.Data" idea mentioned in a sibling thread is good alternative, though just wordy enough to make ... a shortcut. -Mike
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list