Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 18:34:16 EST 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 17 January 2017 at 20:02, Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org> wrote:
> Avoiding header files would be my only request. As Brett says, the C99
> requirement should not be enforced on all embedders or extenders, so we
> should try and keep the headers they'll use as compatible as possible.

Agreed, we probably shouldn't require users of Python.h to be
C99-compliant. (Disclaimer: I have no idea how many compilers *don't*
implement this feature).

Paul

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list