Larry Hastings larry at hastings.org
Tue Jan 17 18:48:01 EST 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 01/17/2017 12:02 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
> Avoiding header files would be my only request. As Brett says, the C99 
> requirement should not be enforced on all embedders or extenders, so 
> we should try and keep the headers they'll use as compatible as possible.


While that's a reasonable policy, unless we have a way to automatically 
detect that I suspect C99 stuff will creep into the header files and 
break the non-C99 customers.  Maybe we could get some sort of buildbot 
that exercises this scenario?


//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170117/64ebad5b/attachment-0001.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in coremodules?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list