Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 10:34:32 EDT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Remove own implementation for thread-local storage
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Remove own implementation for thread-local storage
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 3 July 2017 at 20:02, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sadly, we only require C99 yet :-/

Handling fallbacks when shiny new features are unavailable is what
autoconf is for, though :)

The fact thread specific storage support made it directly into C11
makes me more confident in dropping our emulation, so +1 for
investigating that *before* we finalize PEP 539.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Remove own implementation for thread-local storage
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Remove own implementation for thread-local storage
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list