Home Original page

[Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations

Naomi Seyfer naomi at seyfer.org
Fri Jun 2 11:34:43 EDT 2017 
Yep, interested in implementing it!  I will put implementation time on my
schedule and tell y'all when it is, for holding myself accountable -- it
turns out I never do anything not on my schedule.

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:

> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 30 May 2017 at 23:02, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>>
>>> All in all I'm still leaning towards Naomi's original proposal -- it
>>> looks simpler to implement as well.
>>>
>>
>> OK, I think having a bit of verbosity is absolutely fine if we win
>> simplicity of implementation (for both static and runtime purposes).
>>
>
> Then I propose to do it this way. We can always add Jukka's way as an
> alternative notation later. I'd like to hear from Jukka before I merge the
> PR for PEP-484.
>
> In the meantime, Naomi, are you interested in trying to implement this?
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170602/4de768eb/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list