[Python-Dev] Help requested with Python 2.7 performance regression
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Mar 3 02:27:08 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Mar 3 02:27:08 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Help requested with Python 2.7 performance regression
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Help requested with Python 2.7 performance regression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2 March 2017 at 07:00, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Your document doesn't explain how you configured the host to run > benchmarks. Maybe you didn't tune Linux or anything else? Be careful > with modern hardware which can make funny (or not) surprises. Victor, do you know if you or anyone else has compared the RHEL/CentOS 7.x binaries (Python 2.7.5 + patches, built with GCC 4.8.x) with the Fedora 25 binaries (Python 2.7.13 + patches, built with GCC 6.3.x)? I know you've been using perf to look for differences between *Python* major versions, but this would be more about using Python's benchmark suite to investigate the performance of *gcc*, since it appears that may be the culprit here. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170303/c2d62b7a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Help requested with Python 2.7 performance regression
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Help requested with Python 2.7 performance regression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list