[Python-Dev] PEP 544: Protocols
Ivan Levkivskyi
levkivskyi at gmail.com
Tue Mar 21 14:05:41 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 21 14:05:41 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 544: Protocols
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 544: Protocols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 21 March 2017 at 18:03, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > I do think it's fine, though, to make it very clear that whether you > subclass or not makes absolutely no difference to tools validating the type > soundness of the code. > There are two places where PEP draft says: "Note that there is no conceptual difference between explicit and implicit subtypes" and "The general philosophy is that protocols are mostly like regular ABCs, but a static type checker will handle them specially." Do you want to propose alternative wording for these, or would you rather like an additional statement? -- Ivan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170321/22ac2b70/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 544: Protocols
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 544: Protocols
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list