[Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Tue Mar 28 12:18:41 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 28 12:18:41 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 28 March 2017 at 12:24, Miro HronĨok <mhroncok at redhat.com> wrote: > I'd like some clarification on what ABI compatibility we can expect. > * Should the ABI be stable across patch releases (so calling > PySlice_AdjustIndices from an existing macro would be a bug)? > * Should the ABI be forward-compatible within a minor release (so modules > built for 3.6.0 should be usable with 3.6.1, but not vice versa)? > * Or should we expect the ABI to change even across patch releases? Given that binary wheels are built against a specific minor version (3.6, 3.5, ...) I would expect the ABI to be consistent over a minor release. That would fit with my expectations of the compatibility guarantees on patch releases. So I from what you describe, I'd consider this as a bug. Certainly, if someone built a C extension as a wheel using Python 3.6.1, it would be tagged as compatible with cp36, and pip would happily use it when installing to a Python 3.6.0 system, where it would fail. Paul
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list