[Python-Dev] Is adding support for os.PathLike an enhancement or bugfix?
Koos Zevenhoven
k7hoven at gmail.com
Wed May 3 17:33:16 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed May 3 17:33:16 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is adding support for os.PathLike an enhancement or bugfix?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is adding support for os.PathLike an enhancement or bugfix?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > My allergies have hit me hard so I'm not thinking at full capacity, but did > we ever decide if supporting os.PathLike in the stdlib was viewed as an > enhancement or bugfix? Specifically I'm thinking of > https://bugs.python.org/issue30218 for adding support to > shutil.unpack_archive() and whether it should be backported to 3.6. > Haha, not sure if you have actual allergy, or if you just remembered the fspath discussions nightmare ;). You're obviously not asking me, but I'd say anything in the 3.6 stdlib that takes a path, but not os.PathLike, should count as a bug. Otherwise there will just be surprises with code that works on 3.7 but not on the famously fspath-enabled 3.6. I'm not even 100% sure that backporting to 3.5 would be (or would have been) a bad idea; 3.5 will stick around for quite some time still. -- Koos -- + Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven +
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is adding support for os.PathLike an enhancement or bugfix?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is adding support for os.PathLike an enhancement or bugfix?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list