[Python-Dev] Backport ssl.MemoryBIO on Python 2.7?
Cory Benfield
cory at lukasa.co.uk
Tue May 23 20:54:02 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue May 23 20:54:02 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Backport ssl.MemoryBIO on Python 2.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Backport ssl.MemoryBIO on Python 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On 23 May 2017, at 17:46, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > > > He described me his PEP and I strongly support it (sorry, I missed it > when he posted it on python-dev), but we decided (Guido van Rossum, > Christian Heimes, Cory Benfield and me, see the tweet below) to not > put this in the stdlib right now, but spend more time on testing it on > Twisted, asyncio, requests, etc. So publishing an implementation on > PyPI was proposed instead. It seems like we agreed on a smooth plan > (or am I wrong, Cory?). Yes, this is correct. There are plans afoot to look at moving Requests to a more event-loop-y model, and doing so basically mandates a MemoryBIO. In the absence of a Python 2.7 backport, Requests is required to basically use the same solution that Twisted currently does: namely, a mandatory dependency on PyOpenSSL. I’m very much +1 on this. Cory
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Backport ssl.MemoryBIO on Python 2.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Backport ssl.MemoryBIO on Python 2.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list