Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed May 31 18:17:42 EDT 2017

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 proposal: don't default to Optional if argument default is None
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 30 May 2017 at 23:02, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>
>> All in all I'm still leaning towards Naomi's original proposal -- it
>> looks simpler to implement as well.
>>
>
> OK, I think having a bit of verbosity is absolutely fine if we win
> simplicity of implementation (for both static and runtime purposes).
>

Then I propose to do it this way. We can always add Jukka's way as an
alternative notation later. I'd like to hear from Jukka before I merge the
PR for PEP-484.

In the meantime, Naomi, are you interested in trying to implement this?

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170531/c5104b35/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 proposal: don't default to Optional if argument default is None
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list