[Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
Mark Lawrence
breamoreboy at gmail.com
Tue Nov 7 04:39:50 EST 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Nov 7 04:39:50 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 07/11/17 04:05, David Mertz wrote: > I strongly opposed adding an ordered guarantee to regular dicts. If the > implementation happens to keep that, great. Maybe OrderedDict can be > rewritten to use the dict implementation. But the evidence that all > implementations will always be fine with this restraint feels poor, and > we have a perfectly good explicit OrderedDict for those who want that. > > If there is an ordered guarantee for regular dicts but not for dict literals, which is the subject of this thread, then haven't we got a recipe for the kind of confusion that will lead to the number of questions from newbies going off of the Richter scale? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list