Home Original page

[Python-Dev] PEP 561 rework

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Mon Nov 13 20:38:02 EST 2017 
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Sebastian Rittau <srittau at rittau.biz>
wrote:

> Am 14.11.2017 um 00:29 schrieb Guido van Rossum:
>
>> This is a nice piece of work. I expect to accept it pretty much verbatim
>> (with some small edits, see https://github.com/python/peps/pull/467). I
>> agree with Nick that we don't have to do anything specifically about
>> control of foo_stubs packages -- nor do I think we need to worry about
>> foo_stubs vs. foo-stubs.
>>
>> Everyone else: if you think this should not go through, now's the time to
>> reply-all here!
>>
>

> I am really looking forward to the implementation of this PEP and I am
> glad that it is close to acceptance. One thing that is not really clear to
> me is how module-only packages are handled. Say I have a package "foo" that
> installs the file "foo.py" to site-packages, where would I install
> "foo.pyi" and py.typed to? Or is this case not supported and I have to
> convert the foo module into a package containing just __init__.py?
>

Good call. I think that conversion to a package is indeed the best approach
-- it doesn't seem worth it to add more special-casing for this scenario.

Ethan, if you agree, you should just add a sentence about this to the PEP.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171113/926a5113/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list