[Python-Dev] PEP 560 vs metaclass' class definition protections [was Re: What is the design purpose of metaclasses ...]
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Sat Oct 14 15:25:21 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 14 15:25:21 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 560 vs metaclass' class definition protections [was Re: What is the design purpose of metaclasses ...]
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What is the design purpose of metaclasses vs code generating decorators? (was Re: PEP 557: Data Classes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/14/2017 11:30 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote: > As a side note, I don't think elimination of metaclasses should be a "goal by itself". > This is a powerful and flexible mechanism, but there are specific situations where > metaclasses don't work well because of e.g. frequent conflicts or performance penalties. +1 -- ~Ethan~
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 560 vs metaclass' class definition protections [was Re: What is the design purpose of metaclasses ...]
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What is the design purpose of metaclasses vs code generating decorators? (was Re: PEP 557: Data Classes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list