[Python-Dev] PEP 510 (function specialization) rejected
Victor Stinner
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 16:28:33 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Oct 17 16:28:33 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 510 (function specialization) rejected
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 510 (function specialization) rejected
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2017-10-17 22:25 GMT+02:00 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>: > It takes courage to admit failures like this! I think this is a good call. > It echoes the experiences with Unladen Swallow and Pyston. Despite what > people may think, CPython really isn't slow, given the large set of > constraints on the implementation. Oh, I still have a long queue of optimization ideas that I want to try :-) But first, I would like to fix the issue blocking all significant optimizations: make the stable ABI usable to allow to change major CPython design choices without breaking C extensions. https://haypo.github.io/new-python-c-api.html Sadly, I didn't find time yet to write a proper PEP for that. Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 510 (function specialization) rejected
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 510 (function specialization) rejected
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list