[Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution
francismb
francismb at email.de
Sat Oct 21 14:23:55 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 21 14:23:55 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If it sounds as there is no need or is unnecessary to you then it its ok :-), thank you for the feedback ! I'm just curious on: On 10/21/2017 05:45 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > That sounds like unnecessary generality, Meaning that the selection of precision on running time 'costs'? I understand that one can just multiply/divide the nanoseconds returned, (or it could be a factory) but wouldn't it help for future enhancements to reduce the number of functions (the 'pico' question)? > and also suggests that the API > might support precisions way beyond what is realistic. Doesn't that depends on the offered/supported enums (in that case down to 'ns' as Victor proposed) ? Thanks, --francis
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list