[Python-Dev] Inplace operations for PyLong objects
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri Sep 1 21:10:23 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Sep 1 21:10:23 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Inplace operations for PyLong objects
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Inplace operations for PyLong objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Angelico wrote: > This particular example is safe, because the arguments get passed > individually - so 'args' has one reference, plus there's one more for > the actual function call However, that's also true when you use the += operator, so if the optimisation is to trigger at all in any useful case, the refcount threshold needs to be set higher than 1. Some experiments I did suggest that if you set it high enough for x += y to trigger it, then it will also be triggered in Joe's case. BTW, isn't there already a similar optimisation somewhere for concatenating strings? Does it still exist? How does it avoid this issue? -- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Inplace operations for PyLong objects
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Inplace operations for PyLong objects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list