[Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Sep 6 13:15:47 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 6 13:15:47 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I made an experimental PR to remove support for threads-less builds: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3385 The next effect is to remove almost 2000 lines of code (including many #ifdef sections in C code). Regards Antoine. On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:36:51 +0200 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Hello, > > It's 2017 and we are still allowing people to compile CPython without > threads support. It adds some complication in several places > (including delicate parts of our internal C code) without a clear > benefit. Do people still need this? > > Regards > > Antoine. > >
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list