[Python-Dev] Evil reference cycles caused Exception.__traceback__
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Sep 18 06:52:17 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Sep 18 06:52:17 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Evil reference cycles caused Exception.__traceback__
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Evil reference cycles caused Exception.__traceback__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:35:02 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 20:18, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2017-09-18 12:07 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: > >> I wonder if it might be reasonable to have tracebacks only hold a weak > >> reference to their frame objects when "__debug__ == False". > > > > Please don't change the Python behaviour depending on __debug__, or it > > will be a nightmare to debug it :-( ("Why does it work on my > > computer?") > > Yeah, that's always a challenge :) > > Rather than being thread local or context local state, whether or not > to keep the full frames in the traceback could be a yet another > setting on the *exception* object, whereby we tweaked the logic that > drops the reference at the end of an except clause as follows: That doesn't solve the problem, since the issue is that exceptions can be raised (and then silenced) in many places, and you don't want such exception-raising code (such as socket.create_connection) to start having to set an option on the exceptions it raises. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Evil reference cycles caused Exception.__traceback__
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Evil reference cycles caused Exception.__traceback__
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list