[Python-Dev] Soliciting comments on the future of the cmd module (bpo-33233)
Mike Miller
python-dev at mgmiller.net
Sun Apr 8 15:51:28 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Apr 8 15:51:28 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Soliciting comments on the future of the cmdmodule (bpo-33233)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is it useful to update cgitb module?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2018-04-07 02:08, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > This isn't gopher, or something with serious unfixable security > vulnerabilities. It works. What more needs to be said? Interesting, I'd forgotten about the module but this thread brought it from dusty backup tape back into my brain. Part of the problem may be the generic name. I just used it for a programming challenge and it worked quite well. :-) The source is close to trivial, not a burden, and I found the module useful and easy to use. Only nitpick is that the "repeat last action on empty line" is a poor default I think. -Mike p.s. The bug listed above has the authors of cmd2 planning a simplified/compatible version that could become the next "cmd."
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Soliciting comments on the future of the cmdmodule (bpo-33233)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is it useful to update cgitb module?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list