[Python-Dev] PEP 572: Assignment Expressions
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 03:32:19 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Apr 24 03:32:19 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Assignment Expressions
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Assignment Expressions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> >> Neologisms are usually written in the >> other order: "dead on arrival (DOA, for short)." ;-) > > > Maybe we can make use of that? > > if (x - x_base) (diff) and gcd(diff, n) (g) > 1: > > That doesn't work, because the (...) look like function > calls. But what if we used a different set of bracketing > characters: > > if (x - x_base) {diff} and gcd(diff, n) {g} > 1: > > I think that's unambiguous, because you can't currently > put {...} straight after an expression. > > To make it look even more like a neologism definition, > we could require the bound names to be all-uppercase. :-) > > if (x - x_base) {DIFF} and gcd(DIFF, n) {G} > 1: > return G > Great! And to further enhance the neologism parallel, we could allow them to be defined at the bottom of the program. if {DIFF} and {G} > 1: return G with glossary: DIFF: x - x_base G: gcd(DIFF, n) Definite improvement over all the current proposals!! ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Assignment Expressions
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Assignment Expressions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list