[Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Apr 26 03:16:28 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Apr 26 03:16:28 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Peters wrote: > As a statement in a program (as opposed to typed at a shell), > "a := 3" has the unnecessary (in that context) property of returning > (and discarding 3), so it's better style to use "a = 3" in that > context. That seems like a post-hoc justification. If := were the one and only assignment symbol, the compiler could easily optimise away the extra DUP_TOP or whatever is involved. -- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list