[Python-Dev] The new and improved PEP 572, same great taste with 75% less complexity!
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Thu Apr 26 12:06:33 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Apr 26 12:06:33 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] The new and improved PEP 572, same great taste with 75% less complexity!
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] The new and improved PEP 572, same great taste with 75% less complexity!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:02 AM, Guido van Rossum <gvanrossum at gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe the order for d[k] = v should also be reconsidered? If so, it would be something like: 1) Evaluate d 2) Evaluate k 3) Evaluate v 4) Call d.__setitem__(k, v), via slots etc In a vacuum, I don't have a problem with that. But I suspect that it'd break more code than the comprehensions changes do. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] The new and improved PEP 572, same great taste with 75% less complexity!
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] The new and improved PEP 572, same great taste with 75% less complexity!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list