[Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Thu Apr 26 21:12:56 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Apr 26 21:12:56 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:00:46PM +0100, Zero Piraeus wrote: > Since it now looks like it really *does* have a decent chance, and > maybe another -1 has a small chance of tipping the balance: my > reaction to the proposal is also emotional. Visceral, in fact, to the > extent that I'd aim to read and write less Python if it became > commonplace. Funnily enough, that's what some people said about decorator syntax, ternary if, type annotations and list comprehensions. All of them have become great additions to the language. I hated the idea of aping C and adding += operators and swore I'd never use them. That lasted, well, about a month. Just sayin'. -- Steve
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] (name := expression) doesn't fit the narrative of PEP 20
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list