[Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences)
Chris Barker
chris.barker at noaa.gov
Wed Feb 21 17:30:52 EST 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Feb 21 17:30:52 EST 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > At this point the PEP itself has not been approved, and is undergoing > changes. I don't see anything happening with it right now while 3.7 is > going through it's final stages to release. Once 3.7.0 is published we can > come back to this. > well, it was originally targeted for 3.5, so it did need kick to get going. Probably too late for 3.7.0, but no reason not to get it moving if there is support, and aren't objections. Anyone know if it paused to controversy or just lack of momentum? From a quick search, it looks like discussion simply petered out in Sept 2016. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chris.Barker at noaa.gov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180221/e1d6b59a/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list