[Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences)
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Feb 21 21:52:32 EST 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Feb 21 21:52:32 EST 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 22 February 2018 at 08:35, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > It's too late for 3.7 period, but there's no reason it can't be considered > for 3.8. Something else the PEP needs is a new champion - my original interest was to help lower barriers to Python 3 migration, but it's now more about the general ergonmics of the bytes type, and I don't do enough low level protocol work these days to have a strong opinion on that. That new champion could be Elias, or else perhaps Ethan Furman (who drove the last round of proposed updates to the PEP, which unfortunately don't appear to have been submitted to the PEPs repo: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-September/146043.html) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467 (Minor API improvements for binary sequences) - any thoughts?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list