[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Jul 3 19:13:20 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jul 3 19:13:20 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote: > If we had followed the math precedent, instead of <other computer > language>, we would have set builders, list builders, dict builders, and > generator builders. I was intending to suggest something like that back when comprehensions were first being discussed, but people raced ahead and adopted the term "comprehension" before I got the chance. "List builder" and "dict builder" make a lot of sense, but "generator builder" not so much -- it *is* a generator, not something that builds a generator. In fact it doesn't build anything in the sense that the others do. So maybe "generator expression" is the best we could have done. -- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list