[Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.barker at noaa.gov
Fri Jul 6 11:51:16 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Jul 6 11:51:16 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Are we just having fun here? Or might we actually start using a new naming convention for the-syntax-formerly-known-as-generator-expressions? -CHB Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 3, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > > Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> - list builder syntax is syntax which returns a list; >> - dict builder syntax is syntax which returns a dict; >> - set builder syntax is syntax which returns a set; >> - generator builder syntax is syntax which returns a generator. > > You only get a list/dict/set from the first three after > you've run the iterators within it, but with a generator > expression, you already have a generator before you've > run it. That makes it feel different to me. > > -- > Greg > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/chris.barker%40noaa.gov
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list