[Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
arj.python at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 11:14:24 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Jul 12 11:14:24 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sorry for reviving the dead but community acceptance, a fundamental pep principle has not been respected for 572 also 29 core devs dislike vs 3 like maybe there are special cases where the BDFL can pin issues also, maybe there are two aspects, one disliking := and one the actual expression assignment as for me i don't like the := symbol Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180712/67bb9eb6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list