Ivan Levkivskyi levkivskyi at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 11:48:52 EDT 2018

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 12 July 2018 at 16:41, Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote:

> 2018-07-12 17:14 GMT+02:00 Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer <arj.python at gmail.com
> >:
> > sorry for reviving the dead but community acceptance, a fundamental pep
> > principle has not been respected for 572
> >
> > also 29 core devs dislike vs 3 like
>
> [...] *as the PEP evolved* in the meanwhile.


Yes, the PEP has improved significantly since that time. My guess is the
same poll taken now could give an opposite result.

--
Ivan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180712/86e12a76/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list