Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com
Thu Jul 12 13:56:48 EDT 2018

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:

> ​[...]
>


>   I was -1 as well, but I’d say I’m a firm +0 now[*].  I like how many of
> the problematic syntactic and semantic issues have been narrowed and
> prohibited, and I can see myself using this sparingly.
>
​[...]

I think experience will show that's how it's best used - only for
measurable wins. But then Python is the kind of language where "if it's
simpler, use that" is a part of the philosophy, thanks to the Zen's
popularity.​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180712/75c0a6ef/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list