[Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
INADA Naoki
songofacandy at gmail.com
Sat Jul 21 13:07:32 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Jul 21 13:07:32 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:28 AM Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer at ugent.be> wrote: > > Hello, > > I finally managed to get some real-life benchmarks for why we need a > faster C calling protocol (see PEPs 576, 579, 580). Good job. But I already +1 for adding support for extension callable type. Do you think this benchmark can be optimized more in future optimization which is possible by PEP 580, but not 576? > > I should mention that this was done on Python 2.7.15 (SageMath is not > yet ported to Python 3) but I see no reason why the conclusions > shouldn't be valid for newer Python versions. I used SageMath 8.3.rc1 > and Cython 0.28.4. Do you mean you backport LOAD_METHOD and fastcall to Python 2.7 for benchmarking? Reproducing it seems hard job to me... -- INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list