Jeroen Demeyer J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Sun Jul 22 12:30:55 EDT 2018

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 2018-07-22 18:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Sorry I don't have better news.

I don't consider that particularly bad news (but not good news either). 
I feel like the status on PEP 580 isn't anywhere near accepted anyway.

I just hope that Python development won't stall completely. Even if no 
formal action can be taken on this PEP (or any other), I hope that there 
will still be informal discussion.


Jeroen.

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list