[Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
INADA Naoki
songofacandy at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 02:25:36 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Jun 18 02:25:36 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I didn't meant comparing tp_fastcall and your PEP. I just meant we need to compare complexity and benefit (performance), and we need reference implementation for comparing. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:03 PM Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer at ugent.be> wrote: > On 2018-06-18 03:34, INADA Naoki wrote: > > Victor had tried to add `tp_fastcall` slot, but he suspended his effort > > because > > it's benefit is not enough for it's complexity. > > https://bugs.python.org/issue29259 > > I has a quick look at that patch and it's really orthogonal to what I'm > proposing. I'm proposing to use the slot *instead* of existing fastcall > optimizations. Victor's patch was about adding fastcall support to > classes that didn't support it before. > > > Jeroen. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/songofacandy%40gmail.com > -- INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180618/e0133d1f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list