[Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
Jeroen Demeyer
J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Wed Jun 20 10:49:38 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jun 20 10:49:38 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2018-06-20 16:42, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > I'm wondering what amount of code and debugging is needed for, say, > Cython or Numba to implement that protocol as a caller, without going > through the C API's indirections (for performance). The goal is to have a really fast C API without a lot of indirections. If Cython or Numba can implement the protocol faster than CPython, we should just change the CPython implementation to be equally fast.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list