[Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Jun 20 12:16:42 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jun 20 12:16:42 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:09:00 +0200 Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote: > > > If we can't at Python 3.7, I think we should do it at 3.8. > > What's the rationale to make it public in 3.7? Can't it wait for 3.8? > The new PEPs target 3.8 anyway, no? > > IMHO it's too late for 3.7. Agreed with Victor. Also Jeroen's work might lead us to change the protocol for better flexibility or performance. Let's not make it a public API too early. Regards Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list