[Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Fri Jun 22 12:41:28 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Jun 22 12:41:28 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:13:44AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Honestly it looks to me like the status quo is perfect. Does this example work for you? py> (17.1).hex == (17.1).hex True But: py> a = 17.1 py> b = 17.1 py> a.hex == b.hex False I know why it happens -- at the REPL, the interpreter uses the same object for both 17.1 instances when they're part of the same statement, but not when they're on separate lines. I just don't know whether this is desirable or not. -- Steve
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list