[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Sun Jun 24 07:47:40 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Jun 24 07:47:40 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 03:56:47PM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > There is no consensus that the change to comprehensions was a good thing > or justified. On re-reading that, I think its wrong -- it wasn't really what I intended to say. What I intended to say was, in hindsight, more like: *Despite the consensus to change comprehension scope*, there's a contingent of people who are not convinced that the change was a good thing or justified. Sorry for the inaccurate comment. Mea culpa. -- Steve
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list