[Python-Dev] PEP 576
Mark Shannon
mark at hotpy.org
Tue Jun 26 15:43:59 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Jun 26 15:43:59 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Policy on refactoring/clean up
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 576
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all, Just a reminder that PEP 576 still exists as a lightweight alternative to PEP 575/580. It achieves the same goals as PEP 580 but is much smaller. https://github.com/markshannon/pep-576 Unless there is a big rush, I would like to do some experiments as to whether the new calling convention should be typedef (*callptr)(PyObject *func, PyObject *const *stack, Py_ssize_t nargs, PyObject *kwnames); or whether the increased generality of: typedef (*callptr)(PyObject *func, PyObject *const *stack, Py_ssize_t nargs, PyObject *kwnames, PyTupleObject *starargs, PyObject *kwdict); is a worthwhile enhancement. An implementation can be found here: https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/master...markshannon:pep-576-minimal Cheers, Mark.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Policy on refactoring/clean up
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 576
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list