[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Wed Jun 27 07:08:28 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jun 27 07:08:28 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:19 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 05:52:16PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> def test(): >> a = 1 >> b = 2 >> vars = {key: locals()[key] for key in locals()} >> return vars >> >> What would your intuition say? Should this be equivalent to dict(locals()) ? > > That example is so elegant it makes me want to cry. > > And not just because you shadowed the vars() builtin *wink* It gets funnier with nested loops. Or scarier. I've lost the ability to distinguish those two. def test(): spam = 1 ham = 2 vars = [key1+key2 for key1 in locals() for key2 in locals()] return vars Wanna guess what that's gonna return? ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list