[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Jun 27 09:41:23 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Jun 27 09:41:23 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Why is this discussion talking about comprehensions at all? Is there a decent use case for using assignments in comprehensions (as opposed to language lawyering or deliberate obfuscation)? Regards Antoine. On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 01:25:14 +1200 Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote: > > Using this assigned result elsewhere in the same expression (akin to > > regex backreferences) is not a part of the basic idea actually. > > If that's true, then the proposal has mutated into something > that has *no* overlap whatsoever with the use case that started > this whole discussion, which was about binding a temporary > variable in a comprehension, for use *within* the comprehension. > > > It depends on the evaluation order (and whether something is evaluated > > at all), > > Which to my mind is yet another reason not to like ":=". >
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list