[Python-Dev] PEP 574 (pickle 5) implementation and backport available
Neil Schemenauer
nas-python at arctrix.com
Fri May 25 16:50:57 EDT 2018
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri May 25 16:50:57 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 574 (pickle 5) implementation and backport available
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 574 (pickle 5) implementation and backport available
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2018-05-25, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Do you have something specific in mind? I think compressed by default is a good idea. My quick proposal: - Use fast compression like lz4 or zlib with Z_BEST_SPEED - Add a 'compress' keyword argument with a default of None. For protocol 5, None means to compress. Providing 'compress' != None for older protocols will raise an error. The compression overhead will be small compared to the pickle/unpickle costs. If someone wants to apply their own (e.g. better) compression, they can set compress=False. An alternative idea is to have two different protocol formats. E.g. 5 and 6. One is "pickle 5" with compression, one without compression. I don't like that as much since it breaks the idea that higher protocol numbers are "better". Regards, Neil
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 574 (pickle 5) implementation and backport available
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 574 (pickle 5) implementation and backport available
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list