[Python-Dev] configparser: should optionxform be idempotent?
Steve Dower
steve.dower at python.org
Fri Mar 8 10:58:38 EST 2019
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Mar 8 10:58:38 EST 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] configparser: should optionxform be idempotent?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] configparser: should optionxform be idempotent?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I just have one thing to add to the discussion, which is this: https://youtu.be/hAnCiTpxXPg?t=6339 Yes, people actually read and interpret our documentation :) So discussions like this are probably a good thing in terms of getting the best descriptions in there, but if we use a specific technical term *not quite right* then we will be found out. (A few of us core devs chatted with Al afterwards and there's no bad blood, so don't worry about that.) Cheers, Steve
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] configparser: should optionxform be idempotent?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] configparser: should optionxform be idempotent?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list