Christian Heimes christian at python.org
Mon May 20 17:20:58 EDT 2019

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 20/05/2019 23.12, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
> socketserver.py is also questionable

I briefly though about the module, but didn't consider it for removal. The http.server, xmlrpc.server, and logging configuration server are implemented on top of the socketserver. I don't want to remove the socketserver module without a suitable replacement for http.server in the standard library.

Christian

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list