Simon Cross hodgestar+pythondev at gmail.com
Mon May 20 18:41:19 EDT 2019

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Woot. +100 on this PEP.

> If the stdlib didn't have NNTP support, obviously nobody would suggest
> adding it nowadays.

Perhaps this is a good reason to keep nntplib in the deprecation list?
Another question is "are there any places using nntplib where `pip install
nntplib`" is not an reasonable option? There's quite a lot of time before
3.10 to move nntplib into an outside package.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190521/0e27fb8b/attachment.html>

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list