[Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
Victor Stinner
vstinner at redhat.com
Tue May 21 19:06:34 EDT 2019
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue May 21 19:06:34 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le mar. 21 mai 2019 à 23:05, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> a écrit : > If the tests don't work and the module is unmaintained, then maybe we > should disable the tests and put a prominent notice in the docs saying > that it's unmaintained and any use is at your own risk. It's not a > pleasant thing to do, but if that's the reality of the situation then > it's probably better to be up front about it than to stick our fingers > in our ears and waste folks time with spurious test failures. And > perhaps someone would actually step up to maintain it. Well, I already did that in the past. Lib/test/test_ftplib.py: @skipUnless(False, "FIXME: bpo-32706") => skipped since 2018-01-29 Lib/test/test_nntplib.py: @unittest.skipIf(True, "FIXME: see bpo-32128") => skipped since 2017-11-25. Oh, I even closed https://bugs.python.org/issue32128. Well, I'm kind of tired of waiting for fixes in nntplib, so I decided to immediately close the issue. I'm quite sure that nobody will fix it "soon" :-) (hint: there FIXME is still there) I'm not sure about documenting the module as "unmaintained". Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list