[Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
Random832
random832 at fastmail.com
Wed May 22 01:38:41 EDT 2019
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed May 22 01:38:41 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 21, 2019, at 14:17, Christian Heimes wrote: > thanks for bringing this topic up. Initially I considered http.server, > too. But as Guido put it, it's both used and useful for local testing > and quick hacks. I'm already facing opposition for modules that are > less controversial and useful than http.server, too. Could the high-level functionality of http.server (and perhaps socketserver as a whole) be rebuilt on top of asyncio, with serve_forever implicitly starting an asyncio loop with the server as the only task? Or are the paradigms too different?
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list