[Python-Dev] PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Sun May 26 07:20:53 EDT 2019
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun May 26 07:20:53 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 8:07 PM Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 08:44:33AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: > > > From my reading of the description, you could also "assert a is b" - > > is that correct? > > Yes, that's already the behaviour. > > py> def demo(): > ... a = locals() > ... b = locals() > ... print(a is b) > ... > py> demo() > True > Sure, but this PEP is all about defining things that weren't previously defined, so I wanted to clarify intent rather than current behaviour. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list