Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon May 27 11:05:32 EDT 2019

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, 27 May 2019 09:27:33 -0400
David Mertz <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:17 PM Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info>
> wrote:
> 
> > > Nobody reads warnings.  
> >
> > If nobody reads warnings, we should just remove the warnings module and
> > be done with it. That should probably be a PEP.
> >  
> 
> We'll have to start issuing a PendingDeprecationWarning when folk import
> the `warnings` module. :-)

And message users that they can `pip install warnings` to get the
independently-maintained version ;-)

Regards

Antoine.

---

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list