[Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Tue May 28 06:03:09 EDT 2019
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue May 28 06:03:09 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:37:17AM +0100, Paul Moore wrote: > Of course, all of this is only if we have decided to formalise the > semantics and change CPython to conform. I've never personally been > affected by any of the edge cases with locals(), so on a purely > personal basis, I'm equally happy with "do nothing" :-) I don't think "Do Nothing" is a good option, because (as I understand it) the status quo has some weird bugs when you have tracing functions written in Python (but not in C?). So something has to change, one way or another. Hence Nick's PEP. -- Steven
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [PEP 558] thinking through locals() semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list